Statute of Frauds

Origins of the Statute of Frauds

1677 England passed the law “An Act for the Prevention of Frauds and Abuses.”
Certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought to be enforceable.
Today, almost every state has a Statute of Frauds.
The Statute of Frauds
To be enforceable, the following types of contracts must be in writing and signed:
§ Contracts involving interest in land.
§ Contracts involving “One Year Rule.”
§ Collateral or Secondary Contracts.
§ Promise made in consideration of marriage.
§ Contracts for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more.
Contracts Involving Interests in Land
Land includes all physical objects that are permanently attached to the soil: buildings, fences, trees, and the soil itself.
All contracts for the transfer of other interest in land: mortgages and leases.
Case 14.1: Michel v. Bush (2001).
The One-Year Rule
A contract that cannot, by its own terms, be performed within one year from the date it was formed must be in writing to be enforceable.
One-year period begins to run the day after the contract is made.
§ Test:  Whether performance is possible (although unlikely) within one year.
Collateral Promises
Primary v. Secondary Obligations.
“Main Purpose Rule” Exception .
Estate Debts.
Promises Made in Consideration of Marriage
Prenuptial agreements must be in writing and signed to be enforceable.
Contracts must be supported by some consideration to be enforceable.
Prenuptial agreements may not be enforceable if the agreement is not voluntary.
Contracts for the Sale of Goods
UCC requires a writing or memorandum for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more. Exceptions:
§ Partial Performance.
§ Admissions.
§ Promissory Estoppel.
§ Special Exceptions under the UCC.
Sufficiency of the Writing
Under the Statue of Frauds.
§ Must name, identify subject matter, consideration, other essential terms, and must be signed by the the party against whom enforcement is sought.
Under the UCC.
§ Need only name the quantity term and be signed by the party to be charged.
Case 14.3: Interstate Litho Corp. v. Brown (2001)
Parol Evidence Rule
Oral representations or promises made prior to the contract’s formation or at the time the contract was created, may not be admitted in court.
Integrated Contracts.
Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule
ü   Contracts subsequently modified.
ü   Voidable or Void contracts.
ü   Contracts containing ambiguous terms.
ü   Prior dealing, course of performance, or usage of trade.
ü   Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule
ü   Contracts subject to orally agreed-on conditions.
ü   Contracts with an obvious or gross clerical error that clearly would not represent the agreement of the parties. 
Case 14.4: Cousins Sub Systems v. McKinney (1999).
Advertisements

Published by

Papoo Parmar

I am so simple and Like to do any special in my life in short way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s